
ISSN-e: 2737-6419
Período: abril-junio de 2026
Revista Athenea
Vol.7, Número 24, (pp. 19Ű29)
REFERENCIAS
[1] N. Qamar, I. Ullah, F. Zeib, and M. Z. Khan, ŞThe role of AI in reducing cognitive overload complex
learning environments,Ť Review of Applied Management and Social Sciences, vol. 8, no. 2, pp.
1111Ű1127, 2025, doi: 10.47067/ramss.v8i2.541.
[2] H. Pang, X. Jin, and W. Zhang, ŞDeciphering the underlying repercussions of cognitive overload on
university studentsŠ fatigue, frustration and academic productivity: Implementation of stimulusŰ
organismŰresponse model,Ť Acta Psychologica, vol. 260, p. 105469, 2025, art. no. 105469. doi:
10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105469.
[3] M. A. Pasha, S. Nadeem, A. Rasool, F. ShaĄque, H. Imran, S. Kanwal, and K. Yasmeen, ŞDigital
fatigue and cognitive overload as managerial challenges understanding the impact of workload
management on the workforce,Ť The Critical Review of Social Sciences Studies, vol. 3, no. 4, pp.
1629Ű1641, 2025, doi: 10.52970/grsse.v5i2.1275.
[4] M. Kabir, A. Zafar, Z. Naz, and F. Maqsood, ŞThe role of personalized AI-based learning tools in
reducing cognitive overload and enhancing academic motivation,Ť Review of Applied Management
and Social Sciences, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 1261Ű1275, 2025, doi: 10.47067/ramss.v8i3.544.
[5] S. M. Kashlot, I. Ruthven, and Y. Moshfeghi, ŞStrategies for managing information overload: a
systematic review,Ť Journal of Documentation, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 249Ű265, 2026, doi: 10.1108/JD-
09-2025-0257.
[6] S. Barigidad, S. Hameed, N. Karri, S. K. Jangam, P. S. R. Pedda, and D. Gupta, ŞComputational
modeling of AI-enhanced learning pathways: A mathematical framework for optimizing knowledge
acquisition, cognitive load management, and student performance in STEM education,Ť in 2025 In-
ternational Conference on AI-Driven STEM Education and Learning Technologies (AISTEMEDU),
2025, pp. 1Ű7.
[7] M. N. Algewatta and K. Manathunga, ŞA BI approach for student engagement and reten-
tion along with cognitive load analysis for educator,Ť in 2025 5th International Conference
on Advanced Research in Computing (ICARC), Belihuloya, Sri Lanka, 2025, pp. 1Ű6, doi:
10.1109/ICARC64760.2025.10962823.
[8] L. Rodrig and L. Marlow, ŞCognitive load management in digital learning environments: Impli-
cations for student performance,Ť Innovative Journal of Educational Research and Insights, pp.
188Ű197, 2025.
[9] E. Gkintoni, H. Antonopoulou, A. Sortwell, and C. Halkiopoulos, ŞChallenging cognitive load the-
ory: The role of educational neuroscience and artiĄcial intelligence in redeĄning learning efficacy,Ť
Brain Sciences, vol. 15, no. 2, p. 203, 2025, art. no. 203. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15020203.
[10] K. Twabu, ŞEnhancing the cognitive load theory and multimedia learning framework with AI
insight,Ť Discover Education, vol. 4, p. 160, 2025, art. no. 160. doi: 10.1007/s44217-025-00592-
6.
[11] X. Wan and J. Liu, ŞHuman-computer interaction strategies to alleviate information overload in
business contexts,Ť International Journal of HumanŰComputer Interaction, vol. 41, no. 21, pp.
13 349Ű13 362, 2025, doi: 10.1080/10447318.2025.2470296.
[12] P. Gupta and A. Prashar, ŞLearnersŠ psychological needs in online learning environment for ex-
ecutive education: role of cognitive overload and learning self-efficacy,Ť Behaviour & Information
Technology, vol. 44, no. 9, pp. 1942Ű1963, 2025, doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2024.2383777.
[13] G. Chirayath, K. Premamalini, and J. Joseph, ŞCognitive offloading or cognitive overload? How
AI alters the mental architecture of coping,Ť Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 16, p. 1699320, 2025,
art. no. 1699320. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1699320.
[14] A. Batubara, F. Rachman, R. Nababan, L. Siagian, and A. Latifah, ŞBrain Ćow: A gamiĄed digi-
tal assessment with chunking enhancing patriotism reducing cognitive overload,Ť in International
Conference on Social Sciences and Interdisciplinary Studies (ICSSIS 2025). Paris, France: Atlantis
Press, 2025, pp. 273Ű281, doi: 10.2991/978-2-38476-499-0_22.
Cáceres R. et al. Modelos computacionales para la reducción de la sobrecarga cognitiva en estudiantes de
administración
29