Abstract
This article describes distinct types of flow and volume sensors, and their respective applications used during hemodialysis. Through a review of the literature, new opportunities in the field of non-invasive methods are explored to optimize and develop innovative technologies in the field of biomedical implants and accelerate the completion of kidney disease treatment. The findings reveal that the combination of these devices and noninvasive techniques contributes significantly to the treatment of kidney diseases. In addition, it helps in the development of biological models and the performance of operational/mechanical analyses to predict more effective and rapid implementation methods for patient recovery.
References
U. Peter Kehinde, O. John Omotola, N. Chukwuwer Igwebuike, E. Solomon Olubunmi, and T. Oluwamayowa Ruth, “Ultrafiltration volume: Surrogate marker of the extraction ratio, determinants, clinical correlates and relationship with the dialysis dose,” Journal of Clinical Nephrology and Renal Care, vol. 7, no. 2, Sep. 2021. doi:10.23937/2572-3286.1510068.
Y. Tian et al., “Self-adaptive epidermal blood flow sensor for high-flux vascular access monitoring of hemodialysis patients,” Npj Flexible Electronics, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 62, Oct. 2024. doi:10.1038/s41528-024-00342-y.
Y. Deng et al., “A soft thermal sensor for the continuous assessment of flow in vascular access,” Nature Communications, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 38, Jan. 2025. doi:10.1038/s41467-024-54942-3.
B. Beamer, “Pressure & Flow sensor types for medical applications,” Arrow, May. 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.arrow.com/en/research-and-events/articles/pressure-sensors-types-in-medical-applications
RACO Manufacturing, “Understanding flow sensors: Types, applications, and benefits,” Feb. 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.racoman.com/blog/understanding-flow-sensors-types-applications-and-benefits?srsltid=AfmBOopC60emUkQ7YCQ2fyrGlOtKR_vWnoXLLYvlK9vVGez4HRnbwgx3.%C2%A0.
C. Yáñez, G. DeMas-Giménez, and S. Royo, “Overview of biofluids and flow sensing techniques applied in clinical practice,” Sensors, vol. 22, no. 18, p. 6836, Sep. 2022. doi:10.3390/s22186836.
L. Zhang, Y. Yang, G. A. Bertos, C. Liu, and H. Hu, “Bio-inspired micromachined volumetric flow sensor with a big dynamic range for intravenous systems,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 1, p. 234, Dec. 2022. doi:10.3390/s23010234.
J. M. Cannata et al., “Development of a flexible implantable sensor for postoperative monitoring of blood flow,” Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 1795–1802, Nov. 2012. doi:10.7863/jum.2012.31.11.1795.
Y. Tomioka et al., “Wearable, wireless, multi-sensor device for monitoring tissue circulation after free-tissue transplantation: A multicentre clinical trial,” Scientific Reports, vol. 12, no. 1, p.16532, Oct. 2022. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-21007-8.
A. A. Fedorovich et al., “Body position affects capillary blood flow regulation measured with wearable blood flow sensors,” Diagnostics, vol. 11, no. 3, p. 436, Mar. 2021. doi:10.3390/diagnostics11030436.
W. E. Vickery, S. M. Steinbach, and G. E. Moore, “Accuracy of crit‐line® monitors in predicting hematocrit and change in blood volume of dogs during hemodialysis,” Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 2137–2144, Nov. 2023. doi:10.1111/jvim.16917.
A. Alayoud et al., “Utility of a blood volume monitor in the management of anemia in dialysis by computing the total hemoglobin mass,” Hemodialysis International, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 419–425, Aug. 2019. doi:10.1111/hdi.12776.
S. R. Abbas, F. Zhu, G. A. Kaysen, P. Kotanko, and N. W. Levin, “Effect of change in fluid distribution in segments in hemodialysis patients at different ultrafiltration rates on accuracy of whole body bioimpedance measurement,” Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 116, no. 11, pp. 1382–1389, Jun. 2014. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01361.2013
S. L. Goldstein and A. Allsteadt, “Ultrasound dilution evaluation of pediatric hemodialysis vascular access,” Kidney International, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 2357–2360, Jun. 2001. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1755.2001.00753.x
L. A. Colucci et al., “Fluid assessment in dialysis patients by point-of-care magnetic relaxometry,” Science Translational Medicine, vol. 11, no. 502, Jul. 2019. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aau1749.
W. Y. Park, S. Park, Y.-W. Kim, and K. Jin, “Clinical efficacy of biomarkers for evaluation of volume status in dialysis patients,” Medicine, vol. 99, no. 31, Jul. 2020. doi:10.1097/md.0000000000021460.
S. Zschätzsch, M. Stauss-Grabo, A. Gauly, and J. Braun, “Integrating monitoring of volume status and blood volume-controlled ultrafiltration into extracorporeal kidney replacement therapy,” International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 349–358, Aug. 2021. doi:10.2147/ijnrd.s319911.
B. A. Baharsyah, E. D. Setioningsih, S. Luthfiyah, and W. Caesarendra, “Analyzing the relationship between dialysate flow rate stability and hemodialysis machine efficiency,” Indonesian Journal of Electronics, Electromedical Engineering, and Medical Informatics, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 86–91, May 2023. doi:10.35882/ijeeemi.v5i2.276.
J. T. Daugirdas and J. E. Tattersall, “Automated monitoring of hemodialysis adequacy by dialysis machines: Potential benefits to patients and cost savings,” Kidney International, vol. 78, no. 9, pp. 833–835, Nov. 2010. doi:10.1038/ki.2010.218.
N. M. Krivitski, “Theory and validation of access flow measurement by dilution technique during hemodialysis,” Kidney International, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 244–250, Jul. 1995. doi:10.1038/ki.1995.290.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.